Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VloggerFair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VloggerFair

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is the kind of non-notable that is covered by WP:Deletion policy. In Google searches it is hard to find anything at all from after the event. [1] is an exception, but there is no indication of lasting effects. Google news has literally nothing for either "VloggerFair" or "Vlogger Fair". Unscintillating (talk) 04:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, last year was the first year of the event. However, major companies like Yelp, Ford, and Intel sponsored the event. Google news has nothing, but try doing a regular Google search. Not all news websites are indexed in Google news.Dnywlsh (talk) 23:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see also the 2nd and 3rd sentences of my post. Except for the one article, everything else I found was promotional efforts from before the event, which are covered at least in part by the policies WP:NOTPROMOTION and WP:CRYSTAL. Even if a few local media had picked up the story, this would still be a problem with the policy WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. Beyond that, the notability guideline WP:EFFECTS is an issue. Unscintillating (talk) 02:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.