Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal Raaj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. WP:SNOW. Also G4 of Vishal Raj. Will salt due to multiple, repeated recreations by the (now-blocked) creator at multiple variations of the name. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vishal Raaj

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible COI issues and reliable sources are clearly lacking. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Poorly sourced, lacks significant coverage in real sources. WP:SIGCOV Wp:RS. Creator’s user page and username indicates possible COI. Zuck28 (talk) 21:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal Raj. --Richard Yin (talk) 02:05, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & Salt It appears to be a matter of conflict of interest. It is not referenced in WP:NFILMMAKER. Bakhtar40 (talk) 12:24, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poor to unreliable sources on the page. Subject fails WP:NFILMMAKER. RangersRus (talk) 15:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:FILMMAKER. Koshuri Sultan (talk) 17:53, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Appear to be case of WP:COI, my be edited by a person closely associated to the subject and also no significant coverage TheSlumPanda (talk) 18:35, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Blogs and other self-published sources, not enough to show notability. Ravensfire (talk) 18:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC) Ravensfire (talk) 18:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Apart from failing WP:BIO, the content appears promotional, violating WP:NOTPROMO. Nxcrypto Message 19:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.