Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikidia (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vikidia

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Bbb23 (talk) 14:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sourcing doesn't show this meets WP:GNG or WP:NWEB, just like the last two times this was deleted at AFD. I also just removed some apparently false claims that this site is hosted by or otherwise supported by the Wikimedia foundation from the article. - MrOllie (talk) 14:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Websites, and France. — Karnataka ^talk 14:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, none of these sources establish notability, with the primary concern being strict independence under WP:NCORP. Actualcpscm (talk) 17:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note If it is deleted, please make sure to remove incoming links from m:. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:41, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NWEB.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:21, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.