Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viewen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:31, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Viewen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially identical to Draft:Viewen that has correctly been rejected twice due to insufficient references, failing notability. Editing pattern of the author also suggests possibility of undeclared paid editing or COI/promo editing. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:CORP. Lacks significant coverage from independent reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom.TH1980 (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There is nothing out there as far as significant coverage so fails WP:NCORP by a mile. Would also suggest locking the page from creation since the creator is so intent on disrupting Wikipedia (posting this to the mainspace despite it being declined twice at AfC). --CNMall41 (talk) 18:52, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of satisfying notability guidelines. Clearly some sort of COI editing. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:57, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. No evidence of WP:CORP notability whatsoever. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Creator has been banned Daiyusha (talk) 12:19, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article creator has subsequently been blocked, not banned, and was not evading a block or ban at the time the article was created. WP:G5 speedy deletion ("pages created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block") is therefore not applicable, and I have declined it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.