Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ViewQwest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 02:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ViewQwest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable internet service provider. The article is written in a very promotional tone as well, with 4 sources listed. CatcherStorm ^talk 07:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think you're right about the promotional tone but this company would seem to be notable. Cnet article [1], The Straits Times article [2], Channel NewsAsia [3], Yahoo [4] (although this last one is borderline at best). I got all of these from a quick Google search: someone who spent real time looking these up could find a lot more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nomader (talk • contribs) 07:52, 22 December 2015‎

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH: [5], [6], [7], [8]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now at best as this seems to satisfy at least minimally. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Going over the hits on Google News, it's a little sparser than I'd like, but there's enough coverage there to satisfy me. A few have already been highlighted here. Plus, the CNET article above is from the US, which demonstrates international coverage. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.