Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Videoexplainers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as spam by Martijn Hoekstra (talk · contribs). CtP (t • c) 22:33, 11 August 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Videoexplainers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written like promotional copy, links to company website in body text, no citations, poor formatting, badly written. Speedyld8 (talk) 18:10, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as spam. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G11. No reliable sources, no indication of notability, stuffed to the gills with puffery. --Ritchie333 (talk) 19:31, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as spam; tagged as such. CtP (t • c) 22:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.