Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VidCruiter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:08, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VidCruiter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. No substantial coverage of the company exists as far as I can tell. WP:GHITS has it's problems, but when there are only 8000 for a tech company it's very unlikely to be notable. Created by undisclosed paid editors. SmartSE (talk) 22:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Previous AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vid Cruiter. I searched for the company name with the space but this didn't make any difference to my conclusion. SmartSE (talk) 22:17, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The coverage is simply to thin to satisfy WP:GNG. Tchaliburton (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:18, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:26, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:27, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.