Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Paris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Paris

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable pornographic performer / gentlemen's club dancer. Coverage in RS is non-existent, and the coverage she does have was rejected in previous AfDs/DRVs including [1][2][3] ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:33, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT without support from independent reliable sources. The article is an IMDb filmography embellished with poorly sourced claims. An independent search for RS coverage found nothing substantial. • Gene93k (talk) 12:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable pornographic performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is a lack of coverage in reliable sources so that WP:BASIC is not passed, in my view Atlantic306 (talk) 00:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.