Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vertices Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vertices Partners

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP. Lack of in-depth independent coverage in RS. MB 23:41, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 07:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article placed by a recent new account, with repeated attempts (e.g. [1]) to promote this as "a leading Indian law firm"; one of the sources offers a more realistic description of it as "one of several boutique law firms that have come up in recent years" [2]. The given sources are a mix of routine announcements and articles by people associated with the firm, which all fall under Examples of trivial coverage in the notability guidelines. My searches are finding more of the same, plus a Startup Terminal interview with one of the founders, but no evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:52, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above and keep an eye on article creator. They've also been involved in Passion 4 Communication (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Passion 4 Communication). Narky Blert (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did changed the content and I am contributing in Wikipedia to help masses, and its rude on your part to behave and talk like this. I am just contributing in terms of content. Abhishek Arora - Abby (talk) 04:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Arora - Abby - The user isn't adding this comment in order to be rude to you or make unfounded accusations - if you're new here, you should go through and complete Wikipedia's new user tutorial as it will help you understand the principles of notability and how we judge created articles and whether or not they should be kept on Wikipedia. If you have questions, you're welcome to message me on my user talk page here. Best regards - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oshwah I understand that there are some guidelines and i am changing content as per your suggestions, kindly suggest me what all i need to change so that i can do the needful, the problem is it isn't the reason of deleting a page because i contributed in some other page also, kindly share the errors in this page so that i can change accordingly. Abhishek Arora - Abby (talk) 06:46, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Arora - Abby - This discussion process is about determining the article subject's notability - it isn't something that can be fixed by updating or improving the article itself; notability is determined by matters that are outside of Wikipedia entirely, including the availability of secondary reliable sources and the amount and significance of coverage by these sources. The general notability guidelines are listed here - I highly recommend that you review these guidelines (and if you haven't already) go through the new user tutorial I linked you to in my previous reply above. These are what will truly help you to improve your edits and understand the specific guidelines that these processes reference. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Such coverage as there is seems tangential or promotional. Subject requires substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources to demonstrate notability. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP HighKing⁺⁺ 15:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.