Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VersionTracker Pro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Is unsourced so does not demonstrate notability by multiple non-trivial secondary sources. Merges can only happen if the information to merge is sourced. This isn't.. Redirects to editing discretion and recreation permitted if secondary sources appear Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VersionTracker Pro

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 (talk) 04:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 12:52, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and delete. Lots of Google ghits but little substantial coverage, e.g. mentioned in passing in PC World. VG ☎ 12:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above reference is actually to web site VersionTracker, which makes the software even less notable. Not much point in creating a redirect either. VG ☎ 08:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 12:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into VersionTracker. The website is certainly notable but I don't think their software update client merits its own article. MvjsTalking 08:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 03:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with redirect If sources appear then recreation if really deserving of own article. -- Banjeboi 16:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advert. Optionally redirect to VersionTracker, which isn't exactly bursting with information. Stifle (talk) 20:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.