Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varun shrivastava
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 00:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Varun shrivastava (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Some notability exists, but in it's current form the article is highly promotional and looks like PR work. Also, many links are PR articles. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:33, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:50, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:50, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep- Going by the words of nominator, the article needs a NPOV template at most. No reason to delete it. Pratyush 09:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PratyushSinha101 (talk • contribs)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.