Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VSD Viewer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

VSD Viewer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic of article unclear, VSD file stuck in toaster. Is this article about the general concept of viewers for Visio files or a specific OSX application? Because if it is about a specific application (as suggested by the alleged version history), it is probably the longest article ever qualifying for speedy criterion A1 (no context) — none of the links given allow us to identify which of the many VSD viewers the article is about. (I guess there are several, seeing for comparison List of PDF software.) To add insult to injury, this article is in Category:Classic Mac OS software, which is blatantly contradicted by dates in the version history. Nowak Kowalski (talk) 22:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 02:53, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 02:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article is quite incomprehensible. It seems to be about a class of programs that open one particular file type that aren't the main program that deals with that file type, then it tries to turn into an article about one specific program with version numbers, but none of the references open... I pride myself on not being a complete idiot but I can make very little sense of this article and think we would be better off without it. At the absolute best it's an article saying "program exists to open files". › Mortee talk 23:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.