Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VCENotes
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 12:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- VCENotes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete non notable unsourced website Mayalld (talk) 07:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Relevant to the education system in place in Victoria. An emerging part of the VCE and is well regarded by teachers and those involved in the educational system in VictoriaCostargh (talk) 09:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep VCENotes is the VCE community today, surpassing the more widely known Bored of Studies. I understand if you need media references to make this site seem credible though. coblin (talk) 09:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 03:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- unless sources independent of the website are added to the article that can verify its notability, I'm in favour of deleting. - Longhair\talk 07:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - mentions on MySpace, other blogs and domain name sites. I could not locate any WP:RS. •Florrie•leave a note• 08:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ghits are not inspiring and there's no evidence of RS coverage. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 13:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 13:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Procedural. Five Years 15:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No verifiable evidence this website meets the criteria of Wikipedia:Notability (web). — Satori Son 21:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable and insufficient independent sources. Ref WP:NOT Orderinchaos 23:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.