Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VALOR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. henrik•talk 20:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

VALOR

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable organization. only links to organizations sites, no sources to be found. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 14:22, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. First event hasn't even been held yet.... 99.12.241.215 (talk) 14:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Revert (?) - This page has useful history as a redirect to Windstream Communications, a company that used to operate under the name Valor Communications Group. Why not just revert the edits? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for noticing. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 14:51, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Normally I'd agree, though in this case VALOR seems like a fairly non-specific redirect to the communications company; not sure why it's written in caps. 99.12.241.215 (talk) 14:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Karl334: Sadly, once the AFD is in play, it has to run its course, so your revert to the redirect page is actually not a valid action until this discussion has been resolved. As evidenced above (99.12.241.215), my suggestion is not met with universal acceptance, so we must reach consensus here before the matter can be fully resolved. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming the article is deleted, a disambiguated redirect, for Valor Communications Group, can be created; we're already halfway there: [1]. 99.12.241.215 (talk) 15:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete MMA organizations is non-notable. I don't see a valid reason for redirect to Windstream Communications as "VALOR" does not appear to be the name of the acquired company and the article/page title doesn't conform with WP:CAPS and WP:TITLEFORMAT. --TreyGeek (talk) 17:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If a redirect is determined to be the preference (it's too early to tell), it really should be redirected to Valor which is a disambig page. --TreyGeek (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is unsourced and the organization does not appear to meet any notability criteria. I don't think a redirect is proper since there are other WP articles that start with Valor that would also have valid claims for being a redirect target. I don't think anyone will confuse an MMA promoter with a communications company. Papaursa (talk) 03:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.