Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey sequel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Ca talk to me! 13:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey sequel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFF, this should not have a page until filming has been confirmed to have started. Di (they-them) (talk) 06:59, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE Filming has been confirmed to have started, so it can have a page now. As such, I withdraw my nomination. Di (they-them) (talk) 06:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Unreleased films such as these should be draftified until release. 82.35.44.68 (talk) 00:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Struck comment from CU-blocked IP. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as nominator, my opinion has changed now that filming has been confirmed. Di (they-them) (talk) 06:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what NFF says, it says that films should "have commenced principal photography", not entered post-production. Di (they-them) (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah you are correct, my mistake. Ignore my vote. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)g[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.