Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Sukumar project

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:33, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Sukumar project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFF and per WP:CRYSTAL. There should be a speedy criteria for articles like this one. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I could make a redirect myself beside dragging it here. But there is not even a name for the project. One can't just make 'untitled/unknown' redirects. WP:BALL-Wikipedia does not predict the future. When principle photography will begin it is going to have a "name" and one have to create an article for the same title. I see no sense in making "untitled" a title and therefore a redirect. And, contrary to the Kailash29792, I don't see how making a redirect is supposed to based on WP:NFF guideline. There's not even a single line on making redirects on NFF or NF page. Thanks! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:46, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:29, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.