Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unlocker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unlocker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software, fails GNG ukexpat (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Not perfect, but just about OK in my view.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What policy-based reasons do you have for your vote?Dialectric (talk) 16:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now at best as the current sources are simply not enough and my searches found nothing better than one News link from 2010. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability. The current sources are developers' sites, a blog and an incidental mention, neither of which satisfy the notability requirements. A search turned up download sites and forum posts, but no significant WP:RS coverage. Dialectric (talk) 11:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly relevant (possibly not): Visiting the product download page causes this Firefox warning, saying that there is reported unwanted software. The message's "Why was this page blocked?" button links to this Firefox info page talking about the built-in "Phishing and Malware Protection".God, maker of the world (talk) 10:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.