Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Santo Tomas seals and emblems

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 May 29.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

University of Santo Tomas seals and emblems

This is a glorified non-free image gallery. There are major image use issues here, and if all of the non-free images were removed, what would be left? There are no cited independent sources. The notability of the university's many seals is not established. Wikipedia is not a guide to UST seals, nor a place to have non-free image galleries. Andrew c ^[talk] 16:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 17:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – this is what Commons is for. MuZemike 21:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —Bluemask (talk) 00:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If ever free images were used in the article, would it make it notable enough? Starczamora (talk) 16:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The images are not what makes it notable or not. We turn to independent sourcing to establish notability, per WP:N. My point was that even if we took away all the non-free images to solve that problem, what would be left? We have no sources, no commentary, and no evidence that this is a notable, encyclopedic topic. -Andrew c ^[talk] 16:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.