Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicode Font Viewer
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Unicode Font Viewer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:35, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An exhaustive search using the options in the findsources links above results in... nada. JBsupreme (talk) 18:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unremarkable freeware. The closest this comes to notability is being mentioned as number 11 out of 11 in "10+ Tools To View, Organize And Manage Your Fonts" from www.gigglecomputer.com. And that's not very close to notability. Glenfarclas (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources, no article. Miami33139 (talk) 21:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.