Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umanath Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Umanath Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any indication of notability about this person or how he passes WP:NPROF. When searching in the Hindi language under उमानाथ सिंह, results returned are about a person by the same name who died over 20 years ago, or other unrelated individuals. Declined at AfC but author moved back to mainspace anyway. Prose suggests he may have had notable ancestors, yet neither the article nor it's sources suggest this person inherits this notability. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Royalty and nobility. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The sources are either irrelevant or not accessible without login. GS gives no research papers that seem to be from this scholar. What's needed are obituaries, significant material about Umanath Singh's research (eg festschrifts, reviews), or multiple academic books that have been reviewed. Without any of that, I can't see how notability can be demonstrated. Espresso Addict (talk) 11:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment* This article is the notable people , deletion is not a option. This article relies largely on a single source, it may be possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThunderClap11 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment* This article is about notable person, deletion is not a option. References are already given. Only one or two links are not open. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrhSR (talk • contribs) 03:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NSCHOLAR.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of notability. Nothing in the article indicates individual notability significant enough for Wikipedia. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 22:25, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.