Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UML Designer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:12, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UML Designer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG. The only sources I could find in Google were primary or not WP:RSes. Apparently, it is the most-installed UML tool in the Eclipse community per http://marketplace.eclipse.org/metrics/successful_installs/last30days. No metrics on use or uninstall rate though and an order of magnitude below the first tool in the list. It's a shame that Wikipedia doesn't have a way to recognize this sort of notability, but the subject doesn't appear to meet current notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:19, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 15:45, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.