Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twurkr
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 03:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Twurkr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete nn neologism per WP:NEO possibly WP:MADEUP Mayalld (talk) 14:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Not even a neologism, it's a protologism. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 14:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Neologism, by its article name of Twurkr and the later word twerkr also in article. Oscarthecat (talk) 14:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC) (copied from duplicate nom)
- Delete no evidence that the term or concept has widespread adoption or is otherwise notable. Racepacket (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Non-notable non-word, nonsense. ukexpat (talk) 18:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Appears to be part of the current fad for Twitter-related neologisms. It's POV and lack of citations also make it unsuitable for merge to Twitter. Cnilep (talk) 17:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.