Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twerking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theopolisme (talk) 23:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Twerking

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to be mostly about Twerk Team which appears to be a non-notable organization. The remaining content would seemingly be an example of WP:NEO with very few reliable references to support it as a commonly used term. Mkdw ^talk 10:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No prejudice to withdrawing if further support but when first nominated the sources were only youtube videos. Mkdw ^talk 07:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the fact that thousands of teenage girls followed that "non-notable organization" is, in fact, notable. Let me give you an example. The Cinnamon challenge and dog shaming are both similar phenomenons and as you can see they haven't been deleted. --Երևանցի _{ասելիք կա՞} 14:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then a separate article about Team Twerk should be made if they meet WP:ORG but most of their citations are Youtube. And you know that if x exists then y should is not grounds for establishing notability and inclusion. Mkdw ^talk 21:50, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable dance style, with a current article that would seem to place too much emphasis on a couple YouTubers. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:29, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly in terms of the definition, the article does not add much beyond the definition in which Wiktionary would be the suitable choice. Mkdw ^talk 05:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep consider moving Team Twerk according to which is most notable, make the other a redirect. Rich Farmbrough, 03:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.