Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunngle
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Tunngle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article seems to have primarily been written to promote the software (see versions prior to recent revert). I've searched for reviews or overviews from reputable sources and come up empty-handed, just the standard few blogs and download sites. Doesn't appear this meets the notability requirements. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Earlier today I deleted spam entries for it in other articles. Seems to have been added by those wishing to promote the software. Dream Focus 18:18, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Fails WP:NOTABILITY and may be promotional. --Jersey92 (talk) 19:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails software notability. Borderline promotional. Philg88 ♦talk 05:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Philg88 ♦talk 05:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NSOFTWARE and WP:NOTABILITY. Feels promotional as well. Possible WP:COI. --Jersey92 (talk) 16:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.