Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TundraDraw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 19:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TundraDraw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, appears to be non-notable software, was not able to locate any significant independent coverage of it. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:18, 20 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:BURDEN, no sources in the article and it has had a week to get them added. Wikipedia is not a software catalog. Miami33139 (talk) 04:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
EXTRA STRONG DELETE. I'm waiting in the wings for my Wiki-stalking friend to attempt to counter me, but I'm guessing he'll just make some bad faith accusations and then find himself unable to produce any evidence of non-trivial coverage of this subject, once again. JBsupreme (talk) 22:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no signs of notability. Haakon (talk) 20:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.