Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuan Anh
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tuan Anh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I don't see any real claim to notability here. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: notability not established, does not appear to have won any awards or charted. JamesBurns (talk) 02:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note – This user has been blocked for sock puppetry and vote-stacking at AfDs. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - no evidence of much at all--Scott Mac (Doc) 01:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication of notability, lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.