Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsogo language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No rationale for deletion given (WP:CSK#3). SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tsogo language

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Tsogo language article is too small and it is unknown where the citations have been put. SpyridisioAnnis Discussion 06:58, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Democratic Republic of the Congo. SpyridisioAnnis Discussion 06:58, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The citations are in the infobox. Some languages don't have a long list of historic scholarship to reference, so they often won't have very long pages. But Glottolog, WALS, and Ethnolog all have reliable information or resources on it, and the fact that it has been asssigned an ISO 639-3 code indicates basic notability. Van Isaac, GHTV^cont_WpWS 07:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Quick keep per WP practice that natural languages are notable. — kwami (talk) 07:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Article size alone is not a very good argument for deletion. There are sources commensurate with the current stub content, and natural languages are generally (even if not inherently) deemed notable. Cnilep (talk) 01:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.