Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump Computers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was : Speedy/snowball deletion. Unverifiable, likely hoax. Article's creator didn't respond when asked for references. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trump Computers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be made-up, entirely original because no sources can be found, unsure if this is G3. Might have been created by a Clinton supporter as a form of protest. Also this source here suggets that this could never have existed. (Another Believer, when you said to me earlier that more and more people were going to edit articles about Trump, did you think about articles like this?) - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as WP:G3. No evidence that this business ever existed. --Drm310 (talk) 08:47, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Might be worth archiving this to the WP:HOAXLIST, for I find it quite amusing (this has nothing to do with my political views, but I suspect the creation had some political motives involved). - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:54, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At best an unsourced rumor and trivia, at worst a hoax. Strong delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unavailability of sources for this entity supposedly founded by a person who has been very extensively debated by the word-wide media (at least in last 2 years) is indeed surprising to the extent to declare it a hoax. Anup [Talk] 17:26, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 21:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There does seem to be a business by this name located somewhere, but that does not seem to have anything to do with Donald Trump, notwithstanding that it is obviously non-notable. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:09, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as it's clear there's nothing to base any actuality of its existence and therefore that alone suffices for deletion, potential notability obviously be damned. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.