Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tripz.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tripz.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the notability requirements of WP:ORGCRITE. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:57, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:57, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete obligatory unreliable forbes contributor source, some press releases/PR, and some mentions, do not make the company pass WP:NCORP Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 00:25, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I see routine announcements, PR, niche publications, etc. Nothing that amounts to a significant depth of coverage (WP:CORPDEPTH) of the subject. Deli nk (talk) 15:05, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nom, references fail to meet the criteria for establishing notability, nothing that is intellectually independent and they fail WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.