Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triloquist (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn‎. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Triloquist

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Rotten Tomatoes aggregates a single review from a questionably notable source, and none of the reviews aggregated by IMDB provide reliable coverage either. No obvious redirect target. Suriname0 (talk) 19:14, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Suriname0 (talk) 19:14, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - @Dom Kaos, Jtrainor, and Atlantic306: pinging users active in the 2017 AfD. Suriname0 (talk) 19:18, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as there are full reviews at Dread Central here and Horror Society here both of which are listed as reliable sources at Wikipedia:WikiProject Horror/Sources. Also there was a link at Rotten Tomatoes to a review at the Washington Times at the time of the last AfD but the link no longer works and has been removed, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:15, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm uncertain if there was ever a review published at the Washington Times, or if they just mean that Christian Toto's affiliation is the Washington Times and he has a review (on his personal blog, linked in the nom). Regardless, thanks for finding reviews outside of those linked to by IMDB and RT, it's basically impossible for a non-familiar reviewer to determine the difference between a reliable and a non-reliable source in this space (they all look non-reliable to me!) I withdraw the nomination, but due to the active participation below I will wait for an uninvolved closer. Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 12:33, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NFILM based on the reviews presented by Atlantic306 above. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:57, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: In addition to the reviews listed above, there are reviews here (this appears to be an RS as Anthony C. Ferrante was listed as its editor-in-chief here) and from Kim Newman here. Passes GNG. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 09:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.