Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treesong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 00:10, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Treesong

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taken from Special:AncientPages. Was last edited in 2005. Seems to serve no purpose. Coin945 (talk) 12:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:46, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ... in its revised format as an unsourced (challengeable) article on the word itself, with dab hatnotes to a couple of mentions (I've also made an incoming redirect from Tree Song). There are a few other mentions in mythology/fantasy fiction, which might just about merit a mention... . Original page was created by occasional editor Mr. Treesong (talk · contribs), who obviously has an interest in the word and might be able to offer sources. Well, let's give it a try. PamD 13:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Though I note that the Oxford English Dictionary doesn't include "Treesong". PamD 13:28, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an unsourced and apparently unsourceable dicdef. Most of the instances I've been able to find for the use of this "word" are in fantasy novels, where the usages represent a variety of concepts different from the one specified in the article. I'm not finding any reliable independent sources discussing the topic. Deor (talk) 13:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence attesting to the notability of the concept, also as a dictionary definition. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.