Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Cloyd (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Travis Cloyd

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable - lots of sources, but the independent, reliable ones seem to contain only passing mentions and the one or two in depth ones do not appear to be RS. Previously AfD'd and deleted, but the new version has just enough new content & sources to not be G4able. firefly ( t · c ) 08:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Cryptocurrency. firefly ( t · c ) 08:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reference-bombed by a pair of sockpuppets Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jared19921j who avoided the AFC process. Nothing substantive in those references. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:43, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agreed, most sources are passing mentions and the article is promotional, likely for the NFT as described. Oaktree b (talk) 16:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agreed Search Engine Optimization type of marketing Flibbertigibbets (talk) 22:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I looked for sources before draftifying, but couldn't find anything independent that might count towards notability. --bonadea contributions talk 13:59, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional spam. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:18, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Unambiguously promotional. --Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:59, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.