Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trapeze Networks
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks. North America1000 09:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Trapeze Networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company. Fails WP:NCORP. Alternatively can place a redirect to List_of_acquisitions_by_Juniper_Networks. Kolma8 (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. There is no prejudice against undoing the redirect if significant coverage in reliable sources can be found.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Juniper Networks where the acquisition of this company is covered. Most of the references are of financial transactions, which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH; the other is a Frost & Sullivan product report, insufficient to demonstrate that notability was attained. AllyD (talk) 07:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.