Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transitional Ethnic groups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 01:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transitional Ethnic groups

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The concept of a "transitional Ethnic group" appears to be the invention of the article creator. I cannot find reliable sources that discuss a concept by this name, I can only find a very few hits to the term that don't seem wholly relevant. Fences&Windows 23:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable sourcing provided to keep this article. Truthsort (talk) 23:52, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 00:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete this article , i'll add some sources, this is a basic concept of ethnicity, there's goanna be many more transitional ethnic groups added, the concept of the name is included in some other ethnic groups concerning to have a transitional linguistic trend. Such as they actually use the term "Transitional Ethnic Group" in the Saraiki page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themastertree (talk • contribs) 01:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Title should change to "Transitional ethnic group". Si Trew (talk) 12:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but change the name, integrate mullato, mestizo, etc. into it. Doc Quintana (talk) 03:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Change the name to what, and on the basis of what sources? I'm not unsympathetic, but this should not be an original research fest. Fences&Windows 01:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Improve or delete At the moment it reads: "Transitional Ethnic Groups are ethnic groups of multiple origins or..." I challenge anyone to name an ethnic group that lacks "multiple origins". And the article has no sources.AMuseo (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research. Bearian'sBooties 02:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete unreferenced, OR. I would suggest that "transitional ethnic groups" implies something different from "transitional linguistic trend".--Utinomen (talk) 23:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.