Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transarchitecture
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Transarchitecture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability. Appears to be Marcos Novak's personal buzzword. PepperBeast (talk) 00:41, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. PepperBeast (talk) 00:41, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete personal view maybe WP:COI not suits encyclopedia. @@@XyX talk 01:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - most ghits are Wikipedia mirrors. No apparent coverage of, and very limited usage of, the term anywhere else. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 00:48, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.