Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditional classes vs online classes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional classes vs online classes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Personal essay full of synthesis. An article dedicated solely to comparing and contrasting traditional and online classes doesn't seem necessary unless sources proving that the comparisons themselves are notable are presented, and even then there's nothing here worth keeping. CtP (t • c) 20:22, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as pure WP:OR. Fiddle Faddle 20:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. No sources, so unmergeable. Possibly redirect, but can't find a good target. Ansh6 6 6 21:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Every article dealing with the general subject will make comparisons, but the comparisons are so general its not like comparing email programs or the like, where a comparison article is justified. This articles isn't going to go anywhere, and the title isn;t a usable redirect.I think SNOW might be appropriate DGG ( talk ) 03:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.