Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torimono Dougu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 18:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Torimono Dougu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced non notable martial arts related dictionary definition, which does not justify a self-standing article, as per WP:NOTDIC Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 01:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deletesee below Eight months is plenty of time for someone to come up with some sources, or viable content, or anything more than a definition. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Torimono Dougu
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Torimono Dougu
- Keep with total rewrite There is no martial art with this name. However, "Torimono dogu" ("arresting tools") are covered in several books (Cunningham's Taiho-jutsu, most notably), and so there is scope for an article here. I'll try and do a bit of rewriting today and see if it can be made to stand up. Yunshui 雲水 10:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Moved to the correct name as used by the reference (Torimono sandōgu), added image and text based on the reference, this is now a complete article that can be added to with additional information. Torimono sandōgu
Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 13:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep in light of improvements by Sam. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 16:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.