Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top PHP Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Top PHP Studio

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT; can't find any coverage besides a master's thesis, which is unreliable per WP:SCHOLARSHIP. The "review" in the article is not actually a review since it just briefly describes the software with no independent analysis. Not to be confused with PHP Studio by Neometric Software (the developer of this IDE is Cayoren Software) Helpful Raccoon (talk) 18:13, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Computing, and Software. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 18:13, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 07:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete After checking around, I couldn’t find any solid, independent coverage about this software. Just one mention in an academic thesis, which doesn’t count per WP guidelines. The article doesn’t show that this IDE stands out in any meaningful way, there’s no real-world recognition, reviews, or press. If it were notable in the dev or tech community, we’d see more buzz or analysis out there. As it is, it looks like a small tool without enough notability for Wikipedia. Pridemanty (talk) 12:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet WP:NSOFT no notable coverage in tech news or blogs. Just a small IDE used by some people. Mobidev (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator and Pridemanty —A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 02:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.