Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiny Urban Kitchen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny Urban Kitchen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Beyond this coverage in the Boston Globe and winning a food blog competition 13 years ago, I cannot find enough reliable secondary coverage beyond passing mentions which marks this blog as notable. It should be noted that this article has been marked for deletion for 12 years! pinktoebeans ^(talk) 15:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Websites. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 15:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Two references are still "multiple". Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Subject has good enough sourcing in the article to pass WP:GNG. As Eastmain noted, the subject has multiple pieces of significant coverage. User:Let'srun 19:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - Popular local blog, but hasn't received any attention from sources outside that local area (and not very much locally, either, apart from the Globe and a local award, which don't usually count for much in terms of notability). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per nominator, Eastmain, and User:Let'srun. They state that there are multiple SIGCOV sources. Then why did the nominator go ahead and nominate anyway? It's NOT the case that we lack AfDs! gidonb (talk) 07:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it was also featured on a public radio segment a decade ago [1]. I think we have GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 00:12, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If not the blog, the lady that runs it seems notable, she's gotten some coverage [2]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:16, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - some additional coverage: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2600523482/67C55DCEF3C34D01PQ/2. - Indefensible (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.