Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thumb twiddling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There were two challenges, no sources and no notability, but both can be addressed by adding sources. Sources have duly been added so no grounds for deletion remain. NAC—S Marshall T/C 00:22, 29 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Thumb twiddling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination: no sources for the last four years. No indication of notability. No real hope for improvement. Rklawton (talk) 20:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The phrase is ubiquitous and in my opinion the encyclopedia would be improved if a sourced piece on this activity and nervous tic can be produced. Content here goes well beyond a dictionary definition. This would be a good one for RESCUE SQUAD to take a look at, in my opinion. No formal recommendation at this time. 02:45, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. 4,000 results on Google books. Have personally added two references. Cloudz 679 22:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.