Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Won't Hurt...
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. It looks like there will be no source review forthcoming so I'll close this as No Consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- This Won't Hurt... (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
album that is not notable under WP:NMUSIC and the WP:GNG. little more than a track listing, and none of this band's other albums have articles either. refs listed aren't significant secondary coverage either. StartOkayStop (talk) 22:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. StartOkayStop (talk) 22:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:NALBUM#C1/GNG. Note that the presence of articles on subject's other albums have little bearing on this discussion. Regardless, taking a quick look, they could almost certainly be restored from redirect based on available coverage.
- 145 word dead tree review in AMP (magazine) [1]
- 300 word online review on punknews.org [2]
- 255 word dead tree review in Razorcake, a long-running zine with editorial staff [3]
- 106 word dead tree review in Maximum Rocknroll, a long-running zine that has been core to the west coast punk scene for 40+ years [4]
- A 100+? word review in Ox, highly influential German language zine[5]
- Keep. Siroxo shows that WP:NALBUM#C1 is met. Moreover, when the album was re-released 15 years later (which itself shows lasting impact), the news was noted in multiple publications. Pichpich (talk) 19:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Analysis of the proposed references would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.