Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Week in Science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This Week in Science

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a college radio / podcast talk show. My concern is that it does not establish sufficient notability per WP:WEB. Only one reference listed is a deadlink of a 2003 news story, and due to the statement it is not clear if the link was to determine notability of this podcast or KDVS, the college station which the show is simulcast on. WP:GHITS does not shed much light as the podcast title is a general term. Bringing to AfD as a contested PROD. Breno ^talk 04:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Strong notability, and cited by other blogs. Per usual with OP's deletes of articles of skepticism, we'll just source content.SkepticalRaptor (talk) 03:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep starting to see a trend with the same editor tagging a lot of the science/skeptic pages. What else is on the hit list this week? Sgerbic (talk) 04:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - well-known and oft-cited. I have no facts or opinion on the nominator's motive. Bearian (talk) 18:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - popular podcast, linked to by hundreds of sites. This Week In Science is noteworthy enough for a Wikipedia article.Dustinlull (talk) 04:40, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.