Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third World Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 01:56, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third World Media

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Online promotion for a low-budget porn producer company. Damiens.rf 17:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "Low budget" or not, the production company meets WP:ORG through its coverage and through its sourced and sourcable awards. Article's promotional tone is best addressed through regular editing. Deletion is not required for something that can be fixed. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not "real" recognized prestigious awards. They are small pseudo-recognitions used as a promotion exchange tool. --Damiens.rf 01:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to disgreee, but AVN and XBIZ awards are recognized as prestigious and notable for and by their genre. And as already stated, article tone is emminently adressable through regular editing. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Same rationale as MichaelQSchmidt. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.