Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Time Lucky
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Restored dab. yandman 15:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Third Time Lucky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Vanity of vanities. A company with two "no budget films that star local, unknown teen actors" in production. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, but at least they're somewhat honest and very hopeful. Drmies (talk) 03:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability grounds. The page should return to being a disambig for the two films of the same name Third Time Lucky (1948 film) and Third Time Lucky (1930 film) Lord Cornwallis (talk) 03:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Almost as bad as speculative articals about movies and music that might or might not be produced, this company has no finished projects and those that are "in the works" are not in solid production anyway. Maybe in the future they will become "notable", but right now it seems like some high school kids garage project. Proxy User (talk) 04:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete A7/group. The article even confirms its own utter non-notability, which is refreshingly honest. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed vote to restore Lord Cornwallis's original dab page (didn't see that at first). Clarityfiend (talk) 19:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Restore back to original dab page, [1]. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 22:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.