Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinstuff
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 04:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not supposed to be a place for people to come and advertise their companies and their products. See WP:NOT#ADVOCATE AlistairMcMillan 14:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. → AA (talk • contribs) — 22:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a place to advertise. Furthermore, it's also not an indiscriminate collection of information, or a directory. (→vishwin60 - is User:O in 3 days (possibly)) 23:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - yeah, looks like advertising at this point. If it becomes sourced and properly written I'd reconsider. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 02:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- week keep - there are other articles about virtualiztion software, maybe it should be merged?Statisticalregression 01:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above, and because the external sources are not referenced; possibly WP:OR. Bearian 19:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Rewrite Has been mentioned in Linux Journal, an authoraitative publication about Linux, so it does satisfy WP:CORP that it's mentioned by independent reliable sources. The ad like tone can always be rewritten.--Kylohk 15:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The link above is just a brief paragraph saying "X have released Y which is a Z". Basically the magazine is just reporting on a press release they have received. I don't think that is what we are looking for when we ask for "reliable sources". AlistairMcMillan 23:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.