Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Paz Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 22:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Paz Show

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced. Not notable. Rathfelder (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While it's true that airing on a notable national television network is a valid claim of notability in principle for a television series, a TV series does not get an automatic inclusion freebie just because it can be verified as having existed (which some YouTube clips do offer here). Just like any other notability claim, rather, it has to be supported by reliable source coverage in media before it actually makes the article keepable in reality. But this cites no sources, and on a search of both Google and ProQuest I'm simply not finding anything better. ~~So I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody can actually find better sourcing than I've been able to, but in this state it's a delete.~~ Some new sources have been added — they're still not great ones overall, but they support a strong enough claim of notability that I'm willing to give it a chance at further improvement. Weak keep. Bearcat (talk) 01:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: There's not a lot visible, and it might need a rename to "Paz the Penguin", however this indicates that it was Daytime Emmy nominated (wikipedia says three times -- the 32nd, 33rd and 34th but I'm not digging). "Ready+Set+Learn"+logo+paz&dq="Ready+Set+Learn"+logo+paz&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwixnqvUtcTMAhVLp5QKHVatDOEQ6AEITDAH this and this have a little more. And Paz was apparently the logo character for long-running program Ready Set Learn; there's some info from RSL here, which indicates a Silver Parents' Choice Award. Early childhood mags of the early 2000s may also have had articles. A merge/redirect to RSL might be an alternative but that should be considered together with its other shows if so. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 02:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Award and nominations added in. Though it was thrice nominated for a Daytime Emmy, Sesame St won all three years. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 02:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing for at least general notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It appears to have won a Daytime Emmy, probably sufficient notability in itself. WP:GOOGLETESTing throws up lots of results but being a preschoolers show it doesn't exactly attract many reviews from the major newspapers. Fiachra10003 (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No evidence of WP:BEFORE. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 13:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 21:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very Weak Keep It might meet WP:GNG, and there is just enough sources to vote keep, barely. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 22:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.