Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Narrative Method

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 15:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Narrative Method

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not nearly enough in-depth coverage to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — I was also unable to find sourcing to indicate this meets notability requirements. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 22:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only primary sources found, no secondary sources. Fieari (talk) 01:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Chumpih ^t 17:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.