Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Indigo Parallel
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:30, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Indigo Parallel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Probably created as WP:PROMO but is not unambiguous advertising so it is ineligible for speedy deletion. Fails WP:GNG clearly, has no press coverage at all. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Not notable and may be WP:TOOSOON. OceanHok (talk) 17:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG, no sources found, creator likely has WP:COI. Jumpytoo Talk 20:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Not a crystal ball. Promoting a product not even developed. W Nowicki (talk) 18:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Purely a PROMO for a two-man indie project. One of thousands. No evidence that it's notable. Article created solely by the game's composer. The nominator was being kind when they said "not unambiguously advertising." ApLundell (talk) 15:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete – We absolutely can have articles about not-fully-developed games, but due to a lack of reliable, independent sources, this ain't it, chief. The article is actually, to its credit, written very neutrally by Decima1 Audio... Excepting the fact that they link their own YouTube channel under 'Composers' in the infobox. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 17:12, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.