Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Textfiles.com (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 19:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Textfiles.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies entirely on primary sources. Notability itself in question. While an interesting website, until better sources can be found, the information here is potentially misleading. It appears that people close to the website were involved in the creation of this article. Air ♠ Combat _What's^{up, dog?} 17:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw by nomintator. Didn't see the previous debate. Closed as speedy keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AirCombat (talk • contribs) 18:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.