Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telecel Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Telecel Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional organisation article. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and WP:ORGCRIT. Checked the first 16 references, press releases, profiles, interviews and app download links. scope_creep^Talk 18:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete'. The usual WP:CORPSPAM entry based on assorted press releases or their rewrites. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 04:04, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No signficant coverage, fails CORPDEPTH and reads like a yellowpage article. --qedk (t 桜 c) 16:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.